Hemang Subramanian


Ethereum 2 and the bumper harvesting of tokens in proof of stake

The beacon chain that arose as the result of 3 years of work of the ethereum community secured more than the required number of validators on the network. The statistics of the ethereum network are shown on https://beaconscan.com. While beacon chain works as the active test net for it’s massive scalability re-design, it is definitely a showcase of the powerful unity amongst the ethereum community, by contributing almost 500 Million dollars worth of ethereum for the next couple of years, to enable genesis.

Early statistics of beacon chain show that the expected number of ethereum coins have far been exceeded in number by more recent deposits of 32 eth validators. The beacon chain still continues to accept deposits, and while before genesis pooled validators were not allowed, newer exchange based staking services such as kraken.com have started offering pooled staking for validators. Similarly staking businesses such as staked.us are offering deposits to the beacon chain smart contract even if one didn’t have 32 eth to stake. These developments are welcome and would allow beacon chain to flourish, despite there being a lockup of between 5 and 10% of the available ethereum supply into beacon chain smart contracts that enable validation of transactions.

To learn more about the architecture of the beacon chain visit this URL:https://ethos.dev/beacon-chain/

While the beacon chain does not necessarily alter the functioning of decentralized applications, it does provide eth2 developers to write applications that scale faster and can effectively disrupt the need for large deposit and confirmation cycles once the beacon chain moves to the next level.

The Dow Jones Crypto Index

The year 2021 will possibly be noted as the year when the world recognizes mainstreaming of cryptocurrencies as the first possible type of blockchain based assets in markets. The signal from Dow jones a reputed industry standard for indices and a powerful market determinant – about launching a separate cryptocurrency index will possibly be a silver lining in the otherwise grey cloud. While the Dow Jones index is a critical factor, what remains to be seen is whether mainstream brokerages, traders and other financial actors like banks in the US will make crypto a part of their portfolio of products.

It is already known that major banks in Japan – an economy struggling from negative inflation- seems to have found solace in the growth of at least one financial asset I.e., cryptocurrency. The main Nomura holdings bank in Japan accepts cryptocurrency deposits directly and provides customers with dual accounts – one for cash or other assets and another for cryptocurrency based holdings.

One of the key factors that has been lacking till date in the cypto-space was an index from a reputed and established firms on Wall Street, that can be used for benchmarking existing asset portfolios. Of course, private indices did exist e.g., such as the cci30.com index. The CCI30 was definitely one of the best indices that existed ever, but it was possibly inefficient as a baseline. The DJIA indexes 30 largest stocks by market capitalization.

Hopefully the mainstream banking and stock trading firms will pay heed to this sector. It is a known fact that most ultra HNIs, Family offices and others have invested in this sector. Many of those who used to condemn this sector as vapor ware as late as 2016 have now started accepting the value of this sector overall.

That being said, whenever regulations catch up globally to protect the assets of citizens by preventing fraudulent asset issuance, then blockchain based assets would be much sought after.

Regulation and the FinHub-SEC

One of the most progressive endeavours in the financial sector affecting mass adoption has been that of whether governments are willing to actively regulate a class of assets against fraudulent rent seeking by unscrupulous market actors.

While most markets are governed by inherent reputation mechanisms, that operate as a forewarning to future investors, cryptocurrency markets – because of its international nature has taken more time to form these reputation mechanisms. As a result, regulation in the most advanced countries of the world are lagging and are a step behind the innovation. What is interesting though is that decentralization – like the cypherpunk movement – if left unregulated or if banned can continue to exist underground, without any oversight.

As many different types of assets such as security tokens and cryptocurrencies expand in their reach globally, SEC has stepped up in their functions by separating financial technology regulation from regular security regulation. The FinHub website recently separated from SEC’s main website offers several insights for all kinds of token issuers and for the general public. Similarly, the website also provides information about different decisions taken by SEC’s FINHUB team for example, the rejection of Winklevoss Bitcoin Trust ETF, the no-action letters issued to Paxos Trust and such..

These regulations, be they for ICO’s or for other forms of secondary token assets issued by the FinHub are worth a read at the FinHub website and provide guidance to those in the industry and those in academia about future directions the space of crypto. The separation of Finhub from SEC itself signals that existing regulations and frameworks for analysis may not be sufficient to regulate this sector fairly to prevent malfeasance and to protect the wealth of a county’s citizens.

Uniswap and the Life of a Protocol

Uniswap logo

In decentralized finance, and in the overall blockchain sector, what has always mattered is that the protocol survives beyond the scope of the current software it runs within. As a result, we have seen massive adaptations after adoption of the first instance of a successful protocol. For example, The bitcoin protocol has morphed into multiple different protocols and chains, and coins over the past 12+ years. Similarly, other token protocols have morphed.

However, within the scope of liquidity pools and decentralized exchanges, the feat accomplished by Hayden’s Uniswap protocol is a story unto itself. For example, when uniswap was released it received significant adoption since it offered ordinary retail users a chance to invest their coins and earn some interest from liquidity pools. This market making wherein retail individuals would park their coins in liquidity pools became a significant component of the decentralized economy and the protocol’s did not depend on a single team of individuals, or a single peice of software or even a common user interface. This software system runs autonomously, is governed by a decentralized team, and is managed and maintained by a globally distributed software team. While core protocol specifications and modifications to these specifications are the responsibility of a central organization, the development and user interface is completely decentralized.

When uniswap.org raised their first external investment from the professional VC community which required KYC, AML etc. adherence, the community that engaged with the code, decided to fork off and overnight several instances or clones of the uniswap started operating. True decentralization just needs an individual to login or connect with his/her own wallet, and does not need a login ID or password to access the services of the decentralized application.

In a short timeframe there are more than 100 uniswap protocol applications, some running on hosted services like zapper.fi. Some running within the context of the mobile phone apps such as moonswap. Some even running with their own separate unlinked liqudity pools like sushiswap. What matters is that the input to the liquidity pools in the form of token pairs are sourced from a variety of user interfaces such as zapper.fi or aave.  The more the Decentralized applications that run on the same protocol – irrespective of the user interface or the mode of operating (mobile app, web app, hosted application, windows application) the more the protocol’s life extends.

The network effects of such a protocol  – that survives beyond its source and provides access to users globally, – i.e., virtually anyone connected to the internet  – is  going to give this a life beyond what has been explained or thought of as possible in traditional software development lifecycle thoeries. There is virtually not going to be an End of Life or a single point of maintainence.

The PayPal effect on Cryptocurrencies

Pay pal crypto effect

As someone who studies cryptocurrencies, it is again a measure of maturity when a major peer to peer or business integrated financial application integrates cryptocurrencies. Paypal is the first of those businesses which are public that has decided to integrate cryptocurrencies. Such a move serves them multiple benefits. Firstly, currency markets have been slower to integrate i.e., transaction fees between EU banks and US banks continue to remain significantly high. Secondly, seamless inter-geographic trade is still not possible in most of the world ,since many currencies are not convertible to other currencies directly or indirectly even by Paypal.
As the internet and ecommerce grows – it is now possible through paypal to start paying for goods and services in cyrptocurrencies especially when these goods and services are offered in cryptofriendly regions such as south korea, japan or most of europe. Missing out on this market would have been a huge loss for any peer to peer financial business.

Nevertheless paypal has bought in more than 350 million global users who can potentially buy, sell and transfer cryptocurrencies through paypal’s network. This sudden addition of 350 million users onto the cryptocurrency network, has created additional demand for scarce assets such as bitcoin. It is only a matter of time before major global banks and banking networks and applications such as point of sale systems integrate with cryptowallets. Thats when the true mainstream adoption will happen.

Is there really a migration from Eth1 to Eth2?

ETH1.0 TO ETH2.0

Eth2 is A separate Chain

While everyone waits for a quick roll out onto Eth2, it is important to note that Eth2 is a separate chain by itself. Eth1 will continue to run, with its millions of dapps (and smart contracts) off a separate chain even after Eth2 is fully functional in the next few years. As of now the testnet is labeled Madella. The whole idea here is to have Eth1 and Eth2 run parallelly and application writers migrate their dapps over to Eth2. However, new dapp writers can start working with Eth2 as and when the entire main-net is live. As of now, i.e., phase 0 the development team is treading cautiously into migrating and getting the test infrastructure live, to check for any kinds of vulnerabilities or issues with this network.

Users who want to move from Eth1 to Eth2

Users who hold atleast 32 ETH’s can migrate ONE-WAY onto the ETH2 experimental beacon chain with validators, which will become live when a certain number of validators get on live.


It is important to note that this is a one way migration i.e., those who chose to convert ETH1 to ETH2 will not be able to come back to ETH1. Additionally ETH2 is not yet offered for sale on exchanges. Over the next few weeks (possibly by Dec 1st) as the 16384 validators become live (or funded with approximately 16384 * 32 = 524288 ETH (or approximately in today’s valuation 250 Million USD), then the beacon chain becomes live,. with different shards (or subgroups of nodes) handling processing of transactions for smart contracts. Once rolled out the beacon chain and ETH2 will significantly increase the speed of processing and will enable a whole set of applications in the real world decentralized finance world and otherwise to operate seamlessly.


As of this week the seeding of ETH2 has started and as of the time of this writing approximately 9300 validators are live.
Here’s a list : https://beaconscan.com/validators

Additionally, if anyone wants to become a validator on the beacon testnet there are clear instructions on how to do it here: https://www.coincashew.com/coins/overview-eth/guide-how-to-stake-on-eth2-with-lighthouse

The Mirage of Liquidity Pools

Computer with market chart

The most common assumptions of uniswap.org or balance.io is that asset swaps and liquidity pools are risk-neutral, due to the balancing nature of markets.

The constant product equation does not hold under thee conditions a) selloffs b) reduction in value of asset n and c) when transaction fees for liquidity utilization increases beyond a percentage of the network’s value.

The constant product nature of automated liquidity makers make these products amenable to a V  = mxn formulation wherein V is the total value held in a pool in USD and m is the value of asset 1 and n is the value of asset 2. However, when shorts of m happen or massive selloffs of n happen. i.e., when the ration of m/n change and/or the ratio of m to the dollar or n to the dollar changes, this constant product need not necessarily be valid, amidst massive selloffs. the value of m and n would continuously decrease as will the product mXn as liquidity reduction happens in the market. Similarly, despite increasing liquidity in markets if the exchange rate of m or of n decreases then V decreases significantly. 

Farming Liquidity 

Liquidity farming, another trend in today’s marketplace wherein in addition to pool fees, users can stake their liquidity tokens into centralized pools to earn interest on the liquidity token. Such staking activity can earn the investor interests in the liquidity token through either proof of stake or through a guaranteed value mechanism. That however, could again be subjected to both entry (staking) and exit( unstaking) fees that are large. 

When ethereum is still maturing the crypto ecosystem is fraught with inconsistencies that are market dependent. To name a few, recent increases in transaction fees from about 1$ to about 30$ for smart contract transactions have made liquidity pool investing siginficantly difficult for small investors. 

Aave another protocol, similar to uniswap but different in terms of risk monitoring provides an interesting set of guidelines for analyzing risks with respect to liquidity pools and tokens available. With uniswap the philosophy has consistently been – that as a protocol, it is upto the users or services that are built atop uniswap to disclose or discover risks through disclosure of their mechanisms. Aave built atop uniswap and other decentralzied exchanges provide some amount of visibility into various risks faced by staked tokens. Aave has created this risk matrix that summarizes the overall risks a market faces.

Decentralized Liquidity Pools and Automated Market Making with Uniswap

How Uniswap Work

uniswap.org is a decentralized constant product liquidity protocol, which is secure and creates liquidlity pools of ERC-20 token. given the recencey of uniswap, the protocol almost has 2 billion dollars worth of ERC-20 tokens locked up and faciliates close to 400 million dollars of decentralized trade every day (sometimes even more).

How does it work? – The basics.

Automated market making is defined as a smart contract mechanism by which liquidity pools such as the one we will describe below, automatically execute trades on the ethereum blockchain. What this means is that both the ETH and DAI would have an equal $ worth of tokens in the system. As a example, consider 1 ETH = 346$. Consider an ERC token DAI which trades at 1 DAI = 1$.  In a liquidlity pool, one would ideally invest both tokens in the ratio of 1:1 to keep the product constant. This means that for every 500$ of ETH invested, the total DAI value should be 500$ worth. Now consider a system where a user would invest 1 ETH and 346 DAI since 1 ETH = 346 DAI.

A constant product curve would look like the following where we would have 1000 ETH and 34600000 DAI.

Curve x * y = K

Whom does UNISWAP.org facilitate help to:

  1. Arbitraguers: Due to the decentralized nature of these exchanges, a liquidity pool facilitates mass arbitrage opportunities. For example, on coinbase or on hitbtc if 1 ETH is trading for 380 DAI. An arbitrageur can quickly come to uniswap and purchase say 10 ETH paying 3460 DAI from his wallet.  This would incur a 0.3% fee to uniswap, which is distributed to all liquidity providers of the pool, and is accumulated over a period of time. Then, the arbitrageur can simultaneously trade these 10 ETH for 380 DAI on hitBTC.org for a total of $3800 making a cool 340$ profit – 0.3% commission of about 0.3X3460 = 10.38$.  This kind of simultaneous no risk swapping of ETH to DAI on public markets is an extremely robust mechanism.
  2. ERC-20 token purchases and ERC-20 listings: One the largest challenges with centralized exchanges is their lack of visibility into new token listings, ICOs or IEOs. It becomes almost impossible to purchase  these types of tokens especially when legal controls are in place.  uniswap pretty much allows anyone in the world to list their tokens and to set their own private pools using their User Interface.
  3. HODLErs : This community is responsible for adding and creating the Liquidity pools on the uniswap network. What is interesting here is that HODLers do not really need to identify themselves on the network or to create an account or to register with a bank or anyone here. They can directly login to the uniswap by authenticating or connecting to one of their wallets e.g., metamask or coinbase, and can participate in the uniswap.org economy.
  4. Pool creators: Individuals can also create pools for all kinds of tokens on uniswap. for example, WBTC is the wrapped version of BITCOIN. One can actually purchase or list any cryptocurrencies that they create onto these pools themselves.
  5. Ordinary traders: Globally the trader pool of users cannot access the cryptocurrency token if it were not for centralized exchanges or other secondary peer to peer markets. Uniswap facilitates ordinary traders access to cryptotokens.

In a future article I shall write about minting, and yeild farming in the context of uniswap.  I shall also write about some of the risks of investing in Liquidity providers.


  1. uniswap whitepaper – https://uniswap.org/whitepaper.pdf

The Coinbase Effect on Cryptocurrencies

Coinbase effect on cryptocurrency

The listing of cryptocurrencies on private currency exchanges has traditionally been a were-withal arrangement, wherein the exchanges determine unilaterally (almost) as to which ones get listed in a decentralized world, that is a rather one-sided agreement.  However, with or without centralized exchanges we have seen a significant growth of cryptocurrency adoption for many traditional cryptocurrencies.

That being said – there is a significant correlation between Coinbase listing cryptocurrencies on its site (as available) for trade, and the increase in prices of the cryptocurrencies. This is because the listing on Coinbase spurs demand, and gives legitimacy to a cryptocurrency token that is otherwise only traded on peer to peer markets or on bridges such as uniswap.com. As an event study we can observe that the event of listing Algorand increases the price.  As an example, one can see the price  increase  significantly  on  July 21st 2020.

These changes can lead one to analyze how the returns pare up in a typical event study – as can be analyzed. One can determine the cumulative abnormal returns for algorand upon listing by comparing how much the price changes compared to a standard cryptocurrency index or compared to the price of Bitcoin which has been fluctuating typically. One can also calculate the cumulative abnormal returns by totaling the abnormal returns for the next few days.